The U.S. Department of Justice is facing growing criticism from lawmakers and legal experts amid allegations that it may have withheld or failed to publish key documents linked to allegations involving President Donald Trump in the federal investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Investigative reporting and congressional inquiries have focused on certain files referenced in the official release of Epstein-related records that appear to be missing from the public database, including summaries of interviews with a woman who told investigators she was abused by Epstein as a minor and alleged misconduct by Trump in the early 1980s.
Representative Robert Garcia, the senior Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, has accused the Justice Department of withholding more than 50 pages of material related to the accuser’s interviews, saying that the omission raises serious concerns about transparency and possible selective disclosure. The records in question are part of a broader set that was supposed to be released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a law enacted in late 2025 that requires the Justice Department to publish investigative material responsive to public requests.
Justice Department officials have acknowledged that some records flagged in the published indexes are absent from the released files and have said they are reviewing whether any documents were improperly withheld. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and other DOJ representatives have denied that materials were excluded to protect public figures, including Trump, and have instead attributed the omissions to legal privileges, ongoing inquiries, duplicate records, or privacy protections aimed at victims. The department asserts it will publish any additional responsive documents it determines should be disclosed under the law.
Donald Trump, who is mentioned over 1,000 times in the published Epstein files, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has insisted that he was “totally exonerated” in relation to Epstein-related allegations. The controversy has intensified political debate in Washington, with Democrats arguing that missing interview summaries undermine the transparency goals of the legislation and Republicans countering that the scrutiny is politically motivated. Some legal analysts say the dispute highlights longstanding tensions over access to federal law enforcement records and how government agencies balance transparency with privacy and legal considerations.
As the Justice Department continues its internal review of the released documents, lawmakers are expected to press further on Capitol Hill. The unfolding dispute over the Epstein files underscores ongoing challenges in responding to public demand for accountability in high-profile investigations and the complexities of releasing sensitive material that intersects with political figures, federal law enforcement records, and victims’ rights.
English